检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘鹏 LIU Peng(Northwest Agriculture and Forest University,Yangling 712100,China)
机构地区:[1]西北农林科技大学人文学院,陕西杨凌712100
出 处:《政法学刊》2018年第3期59-64,共6页Journal of Political Science and Law
摘 要:面对生态环境损害频繁发生,美国、欧盟和日本较早地开始尝试用法律的手段来救济生态环境损害。以美国的《超级基金法》、欧盟的《环境损害责任指令》和日本的《公害防治法》为代表的生态环境损害责任立法在救济生态环境损害的司法实践中发挥了重要作用。对美国、欧盟、日本生态环境损害责任立法进行考察,为我国将来制定生态环境损害责任法律制度提供启发,为我国生态文明建设的法治道路提供借鉴。Faced with the frequent occurrence of ecological environmental damages, the United States, the European Union and Japan began to try to remedy the ecological environment damage by means of law. The legislation of ecological environmental damage liability, represented by the Superfund Law of the United States, the Directive on Environmental Damage Liability of the European Union and the Public hazards Prevention and Control Law of Japan, has played an important role in the judicial practice of relieving the ecological environment damage. The legislation of ecological environmental damage liability in the United States, European Union and Japan is studied to provide inspiration for China to formulate the legal system of ecological environmental damage liability, and to provide reference for the rule of law in the construction of ecological civilization in China.
关 键 词:超级基金法 环境损害责任指令 公害防治法 生态环境损害责任
分 类 号:DF3[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222