信史抑或伪史——夏史真伪问题的三次论争  

Faithful History or Unreliable History:Three Debates on the Question of Xia History’s Anthenticity

作　　者：陈民镇[1] Chen Minzhen

机构地区：[1]清华大学出土文献研究与保护中心出土文献与中国古代文明研究协同创新中心

出　　处：《中国文化研究》2018年第3期51-68,共18页Chinese Culture Research

基　　金：中国博士后科学基金项目“清华简‘书’类文献研究”(2018M630135)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：在上世纪二三十年代、上世纪末本世纪初以及近年，分别上演了三次有关夏史真伪的论争。在第一次论争中，顾颉刚、王国维、徐旭生分别奠定了探索夏史的三种路径。第二次论争则以“疑古”与“走出疑古”之争为背景，基本上是第一次论争的延续。第三次论争方兴未艾，反映了新材料、新方法和新视角的介入，是在中华文明探源研究进入整合阶段的背景下展开的。There have been three debates about the authenticity of Xia history, one taking place in 1920s--1930s, another at the turn of twentieth Century and twenty-first Century and the last one just in recent years. In the first debate, Gu Jiegang, Wang Guowei and Xu Xusheng respectively opened three paths to explore the history of the Xia Dynasty. The second debate is based on the dispute between ＂doubting about the ancient history＂ and ＂stepping out of the doubt＂, which is basically the continuation of the first debate. The third debate is in the wing, reflecting the involvement of new materials, new methods and new perspectives, which is related to the integrated studies of exploring the source of Chinese civilization.

关 键 词：夏朝 疑古 信史 伪史 

分 类 号：K87[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学]