论破坏草原型犯罪的立法检审与修正  

On the legislation review and the amendment of the crime of destroying grassland

作　　者：高思洋[1] GAO Si-yang(Man Zhouli College,Inner Mongolia University,Man Zhouli 021400,China)

机构地区：[1]内蒙古大学满洲里学院,内蒙古满洲里021400

出　　处：《青岛科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第3期79-87,共9页Journal of Qingdao University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：内蒙古自治区高等学校科学研究项目(NJSY18355)

摘　　要：近几年国家在推进绿色发展、着力解决突出环境问题、加大生态系统保护力度上取得了较大的成就,而草原作为重要陆地资源的组成部分对生态环境至关重要。尽管2012年最高人民法院出台司法解释将破坏草原资源的违法行为规制为犯罪,但仍无法弥补刑法自身对此类问题规制的不足。在检审阶段,为何要确立独立的罪名、如何界定草原型犯罪实行行为的类型、为何要建构多元的刑罚配置模式防控犯罪等一系列争议性问题成为论证的焦点。在修正阶段,当此类犯罪行为已有刑法涵摄的必要,提出立法的修正论将成为必然。In recent years, China has made great achievements in promoting green development, solving outstanding environmental problems, and strengthening the protection of ecological system. As an important part of land resources, grassland is crucial to ecological environment. Although the supreme people’s court issued a judicial interpretation in 2012 to regulate the illegal ACTS that damage grassland resources as a crime, it still cannot make up for the lack of regulation on such issues in the criminal law. During the prosecution stage, a series of controversial issues such as why to establish an independent crime, how to define the type of grassland crime to be carried out, and why to construct a diversified pattern of penal allocation to prevent and control crime, have become the focus of the demonstration. In the amendment stage, when the criminal law of this kind of crime has the necessity of inclusion, it will be inevitable to put forward the amendment theory of legislation.

关 键 词：草原资源 法益观 刑罚配置 实行行为 

分 类 号：D922.64[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]