中国检察机关提起行政公益诉讼模式重构论  

Discussion on Reconstruct the China's Model of the Procuratorate Initiating Administrative Public Interest Litigation

作　　者：贾永健[1,2] Jia Yongjian(Henan Universit)

机构地区：[1]河南大学法学院 [2]开封市龙亭区人民检察院

出　　处：《武汉大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2018年第5期154-163,共10页Wuhan University Journal：Philosophy & Social Science

基　　金：河南省哲学社会科学规划年度项目(2018CFX021);河南大学青年科研人才种子基金(jbkyzz047)

摘　　要：国家监察体制改革实现了党对反腐败工作的集中统一领导,深入推动了国家治理的现代化。但是,本次改革对检察机关反贪反渎职能的剥离客观上有可能减弱检察权威,给尚不成熟的行政公益诉讼带来挑战,使检察机关对行政机关违法失职行为的监督和调查更为不易。这就要求行政公益诉讼必须重构当前的制度模式,与监察体制改革实现有效的协调衔接。当前可与国家监察机关建立贯穿行政公益诉讼全过程的协同联动机制,形成保护公益的强大合力;将来可以探索建立由监察机关作为专门调查机关,检察机关作为专门起诉机关,法院作为专门审理机关,三者分工负责、相互配合、相互制约的"调查—起诉—审理"分立的科学模式。The Party has centralized the leadership of the anti-corruption work and pushed the Modernization of national governance deeply by reforming the national supervision system. Then the procuratorate＇s anti-corruption function has been deprived, bringings more challenge to the immature administrative public interest litigation. The reduction of the procuratorate＇s function and authority will make it even more difficult for the prosecutors to monitor and investigate illegal administration.Therefore, it is necessary to reconstruct the model of administrative public interest litigation by coordinating with the supervision system. In the near future, the administrative public interest litigation should coordinate with the supervision system and establish a scientific ＂Investigation—Prosecution—Trail＂ model, in which the supervisory will be in charge of investigation, the procuratorate in charge of prosecution, and the court in charge of trail and the three coordinate and restrict each other.

关 键 词：行政公益诉讼 检察机关 国家监察体制改革 查诉审分立 反贪反渎 

分 类 号：DF3[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] D912.1[政治法律—法学]