检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:成斌[1,2] 许伟 胡从从[1] 贺学礼[1] 赵丽莉[1] CHENG Bin;XU Wei;HU Cong-Cong;HE Xue-Li;ZHAO Li-Li(College of Life Sciences,Hebei University,Baoding,Hebei 071002,China;College of Life Sciences,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou,Gansu 730000,China)
机构地区:[1]河北大学生命科学学院,河北保定071002 [2]兰州大学生命科学学院,甘肃兰州730000
出 处:《菌物学报》2018年第9期1170-1178,共9页Mycosystema
基 金:国家自然科学基金(31270460;31470533);河北省自然科学基金(C2014201060)~~
摘 要:采集内蒙古荒漠草原沙化梁地羊柴Hedysarum laeve根围土样,采用形态学方法、聚丙酰胺凝胶电泳(denatured gradient gel electrophoresis,DGGE)技术和二代测序(next generation sequencing,NGS)技术分析羊柴根围AM真菌群落组成和多样性。结果表明,应用NGS共鉴定AM真菌3纲4目10科18属,DGGE鉴定2纲2目2科5属,形态学鉴定1纲2目2科3属。AM真菌分类等级越低,NGS、DGGE和形态学鉴定结果差异越大,尤其在属水平上差异显著。与NGS技术相比,形态学和DGGE方法所反映AM真菌种类主要为优势菌种,显著低估了AM真菌物种组成并高估其丰度,分子测序是对形态学分类的补充和完善。AM(arbuscular mycorrhiza) fungal community structure and diversity in the rhizosphere of Hedysarum laeve(Leguminosae) in desert steppe of Inner Mongolia were analysed by means of morphological identification, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis(DGGE) fingerprinting technology and next generation sequencing(NGS) technology. Three classes, 4 orders, 10 families and 18 genera of AM fungi were revealed by NGS technique, and 2 classes, 2 orders, 2 families and 5 genera by DGGE, yet only 1 classes, 2 orders, 2 families and 3 genera were classified by morphological identification. There were significant difference between NGS, DGGE and morphological identification results, particularly in the genus level. Morphological method and DGGE fingerprint technology greatly underestimated AM fungal community composition and overestimated the relative abundance of dominant AM fungi, while molecular sequencing is a supplement and improvement over morphological classification.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145