检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马亚伟 漆彤[1] MA Ya-wei;QI Tong
机构地区:[1]武汉大学法学院
出 处:《国际商务研究》2018年第5期85-96,共12页International Business Research
基 金:国家社科基金项目"国际投资仲裁视角下的海外中资利益保护研究"(项目编号:14BFX191)
摘 要:现有的投资争议解决机制由于种种弊端不能很好地满足当前及未来"一带一路"投资争议解决的需求,建立一套符合"一带一路"域内的投资争议解决机制有其迫切的必要性和现实的可行性。在路径选择上,应与沿线国家协商订立国际公约,打造专门的"一带一路"投资争议解决中心;同时更多地融入以调解为主的东方文化方式;重点从上诉机制、仲裁人员选任和透明度等方面入手,顺应投资仲裁改革的大趋势,对"一带一路"投资争端解决机制进行具体构建。Existing dispute settlement mechanisms are not expected to meet the need of resolving disputes properly and effectively. It is imperative and practical to establish an effective mechanism for resolving investment disputes. For the route selection, an international agreement should be reached through international consultations to create a special "Belt and Road" center for the settlement of investment disputes. At the same time, more oriental cultures like mediation shall be put into the dispute settlement mechanism. To specifically design the mechanism, special attention should be paid to an appeal mechanism, the selection of arbitrators, the transparency issue and other key aspects in accord with the general trend of investment arbitration reform.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28