检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张晓[1] 白长虹[1,2] ZHANG Xiao;BAI Changhong(College of Tourism and Service Management,Nankai University,Tianjin 300350,China;Business School,Nankai University Tianjin 300071,China)
机构地区:[1]南开大学旅游与服务学院,天津300350 [2]南开大学商学院,天津300071
出 处:《旅游学刊》2018年第9期132-144,共13页Tourism Tribune
摘 要:目前的旅游者幸福感研究普遍借用主观幸福感这一概念,这种借用将旅游者幸福感的概念局限于情感要素,而忽视了旅游体验的价值和意义。借用过程中存在的偏差使得旅游者幸福感的概念化和术语使用存在模糊和混淆等问题。鉴于此,文章借助哲学和心理学领域的相关理论,对现有国外旅游者幸福感研究的发展历程和理论成果进行梳理和评述。研究发现,早期的旅游者幸福感研究主要集中于旅游者情感和生活满意度两个维度,欠缺对旅游者幸福感内涵的深入挖掘。随着研究的深入,学者意识到直接借用主观幸福感概念的局限性,进而开始转向从实现主义视角理解旅游者幸福感。这一研究转向不仅引发了学界对旅游者幸福感研究的反思和拓展,还为未来的旅游者幸福感研究提供了素材和思路。Asone of the main sources of human well-being,tourism has been increasingly integrated by people into their lives. For this reason, tourism has attracted the attention of scholars because of the impact of its happiness industry on people's well-being. Compared with the fields of philosophy and psychology, well-being research started late in the field of tourism. The current research on tourists' well-being, both that domestically and internationally, is still at an early, exploratory stage. The discussion of some problems has been relatively blurred because of a lack of systematic exploration of theories. Most tourism well-being research is based on the fields of philosophy and psychology.Researchers studying tourists' well-being currently generally borrow the concept of subjective wellbeing from psychology. In this concept, tourists' well-being as experienced through tourism is understood to bean increase in positive emotions, a decrease in negative emotions, and a high degree of satisfaction in life. This borrowing of terms restricts the conceptualization of tourists' well-being to its emotional elements and ignores both the value and the significance of the tourists' experiences.Moreover, directly borrowing concepts can lead to certain deviations in the borrowing process, which means that the use of the concepts and termi nology i n tourists' well-bei ng may be vague and confused.This confusion of concepts and terminology in tourists' well-being research causes challenges for future research in this field. Thus, this study explores the relevant theories from the fields of philosophy and psychology so as to comment on the developmental history and theoretical results of current tourists' well-being research internationally. Exploring the relevant international research will help to clarify the concept of tourists' well-being and indicate possible future research directions. This study found that early research into tourists' well-being mainly focused on the two dimensions of tourists' em
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7