检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周飞 沈莹[1] Zhou Fei;Shen Ying(School of Foreign Languages,Guangxi University,Nanning,Guangxi 530004,China)
出 处:《湖北工程学院学报》2018年第5期54-58,共5页Journal of Hubei Engineering University
基 金:广西大学优质研究生课程建设项目(Y204001901)
摘 要:Panther和Thornburg的言语行为转喻理论强调以转喻为基础的推理在言语行为和话语识解中的作用。它为间接言语行为构建和语用因素推理提供了新视角,试图从转喻的角度来说明交际过程中进行语用推理的必要性和可能性。言语行为和语用影响因素都可由转喻作用机制下的言语行为场境来解释,但是,言语行为场境中部分代替整个场境的力度是有差异的,这种转喻连接力度的差异就需要听话者运用更多的语用推理因素来识解会话过程中的言语行为。The theory of Speech Act Metonymy proposed by Panther and Thornburg emphasizes the role of metonymy-based inference in speech act and discourse construal. It provides a new perspective for the construction of indirect speech act and inference of pragmatic factors, trying to explain, from a metonymic perspective, the necessity and possibility of pragmatic inference in the process of communication. Both speech acts and pragmatic factors can be explained by the speech act scenario under the mechanism of metonymy. However, in the speech act scenario, different components of a scenario standing for a whole scenario possess varied strength of metonymic link, and thus the different strength of metonymie link requires the listener to use more pragmatic inference to construe the speech act in conversations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49