检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邵生金 SHAO Shengjin(Radiology Department,Liaoyuan City Maternal and Infant's Hospital,Liaoyuan Jilin 136200,China)
机构地区:[1]吉林省辽源市妇婴医院放射科,吉林辽源136200
出 处:《中国继续医学教育》2018年第29期82-83,共2页China Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的探讨腹部X线平片与CT在肠梗阻临床诊断中的应用价值。方法以我院2010年6月—2017年6月收治的90例肠梗阻患者为研究对象,分别使用X先平片与CT检查,分析两种诊断方法的临床价值。结果腹部X线平片的诊断准确率为80%,CT诊断的准确率为90%,仅13.3%的患者可通过腹部X线平片诊断出发病原因,74.4%的患者可通过CT检查确定病因。CT诊断效果优于腹部X线平片,差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论在肠梗阻临床诊断中,相较于腹部X线平片而言,CT诊断的准确率更高,尤其是在病因诊断中,CT的应用效果远超于腹部X线平片诊断。Objective To investigate the value of abdominal X-ray plain flm and CT in the clinical diagnosis of intestinal obstruction. Methods 90 cases of intestinal obstruction treated in our hospital from June 2010 to June 2017 were studied. The clinical signifcance of the two diagnostic methods was analyzed by using the X first plain film and the CT examination. Results The diagnostic accuracy of abdominal X-ray plain flm was 80%, and the accuracy rate of CT diagnosis was 90%. Only 13.3% of the patients could diagnose the cause by abdominal X-ray plain flm, and 74.4% of the patients could determine the cause by CT examination. The diagnostic efect of CT was better than that of abdominal X-ray plain flm, and the diference was statistically significant (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion In the diagnosis of intestinal obstruction, the accuracy of CT diagnosis is higher than that of abdominal X-ray plain film, especially in the diagnosis of etiology, the efect of CT is far more than the diagnosis of abdominal X-ray plain flm.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200