检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈力 Chen Li
机构地区:[1]华东师范大学历史学系,博士研究生上海200241
出 处:《中共党史研究》2018年第8期55-67,共13页CPC History Studies
摘 要:1962年中印边界冲突发生后,锡兰倡议组织六国会议,试图促成中印通过谈判解决纠纷。关于中国针对这次会议的应对措施,海内外学者历来看法迥异。通过对近年公布的原始资料以及时人记述的爬梳,有理由相信,中国实际上是六国会议的积极推动者,更一度掌控着会议的走向。但是事态的发展却令中国始料不及,六国会议出于对大国的成见,不但未如中国原本期望的那样,调解中印的紧张关系,并促使印度回到谈判桌前,各方反而一再迫使中国作出让步。After the 1962 Sino-Indian border conflict, Ceylon advocated the organization of a Conference of Six Afro-Asian Non-Aligned countries in an attempt to resolve the Sino-Indian conflict through negotiations. Regarding China' s response to this conference, domestic and international scholars have always held different views. By fur- ther exploring original materials published in recent years and descriptions by people from that time, various pieces of evidence reveal that China actually was a positive promoter of the conference, and at one time it even controlled the direction of the outcome of the conference. However, the situation developed beyond China' s ex- pectations. Due to the biases of the great powers, the Six-Nation Conference not only failed to resolve the tense Si- no-Indian relationship and to bring India back to the negotiating table as China had expected, but it also became bargaining chip for other countries to force China to make concessions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7