常见应力腐蚀标准试验方法对比及应用  

Comparison and Application of Common Stress Corrosion Standard Test Methods

作　　者：党恒耀[1] 张亚军[1] 罗先甫[1] 张文利[1] DANG Hengyao;ZHANG Yajun;LUO Xianfu;ZHANG Wenli(Luoyang Ship Material Research Institute,I.uoyang 471023,China)

机构地区：[1]中国船舶重工集团公司第七二五研究所,洛阳471023

出　　处：《理化检验（物理分册）》2018年第9期672-675,共4页Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis(Part A:Physical Testing)

基　　金：所科技创新项目(LW180603)

摘　　要：各种应力腐蚀评价方法的试样形式多样、加载方式各不相同,给从事科研和检测的工作者带来一定的选择困难。通过对恒位移法、恒载荷法和慢应变速率法等几种常见应力腐蚀试验方法进行对比分析,列出了各自的适用范围、评价指标及其优缺点,为科研和检测工作者科学合理地选择评价方法提供参考。Due to various specimen forms and different loading modes of stress corrosion evaluation methods,it is difficult for researchers and testing workers to make certain choices.Through comparison and analysis of several common stress corrosion test methods,including constant displacement method,constant load method and slow strain rate method,the application range,evaluation index and their advantages and disadvantages were listed.It provided a reference for researchers and testing workers to select the evaluation method scientifically and reasonably.

关 键 词：应力腐蚀 试验方法 恒位移法 恒载荷法 慢应变速率法 

分 类 号：O346.22[理学—固体力学]