检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华侨大学,福建泉州362021
出 处:《浙江金融》2018年第8期3-8,23,共7页Zhejiang Finance
基 金:福建省自然科学基金面上项目(2015J01581)成果;华侨大学哲学社会科学青年学者成长工程项目(14SKGC-QG17)成果;华侨大学高层次人才科研启动经费项目(14SKBS205)成果
摘 要:研究政府与网贷平台间博弈关系,通过在支付矩阵中引入公众满意度、平台信誉和政府奖励等条件时发现:政府期望收益与网贷平台诚信规范经营成正相关,而网贷平台期望收益与政府监管力度成负相关;同时,平台信誉的引入可以缓解政府对网贷平台的监管,从而降低政府监管成本。针对引入政府奖励后可能产生的悖论情形,通过进一步考察两个实力相当网贷平台间的重复博弈关系时发现:当政府奖励超过收益损失两倍时,两平台均倾向于诚信规范经营。The game relationship between government and online lending platforms is studied. After introducing the public satisfaction index, platform reputation and government rewards into the payment matrix, we find the following conclusions: firstly, the correlation between the expected revenue of government and online lending platforms' standard business is positive, and there is negative correlation between the expected revenue of online lending platforms and government supervision. Meanwhile, the pull-in of platform reputation can relieve the supervision of government over online lending platforms, and further reduce the regulation cost. As to the paradox situation caused by government rewards, this paper discloses the fact that two online lending platforms with similar strength will tend to operate legally if the government rewards is more than twice the benefit-loss of online lending platforms.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.58.173.156