胸腔积液引流与常规胸穿抽液治疗胸腔积液的疗效  

Effect of Pleural Effusion Drainage and Conventional Thoracic Puncture Drainage on Pleural Effusion

作　　者：张超斌 郑纯 ZHANG Chaobin1, ZHENG Chun2(1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First People＇s Hospital of Xiaogan, Xiaogan Hubei 432100, China; 2. Department of Cardiolog)

机构地区：[1]湖北省孝感市第一人民医院胸外科,湖北孝感432100 [2]湖北省孝感市第一人民医院心内科,湖北孝感432100

出　　处：《中国卫生标准管理》2018年第18期64-66,共3页China Health Standard Management

摘　　要：目的对比观察胸腔积液引流手术与常规胸穿抽液治疗胸腔积液的临床疗效。方法选择90例胸腔积液患者作为对象,根据随机数表法将其分为两组,各45例。对照组予以常规胸穿抽液治疗,研究组行胸腔积液引流手术,观察临床疗效。结果研究组总有效率为91.1%,对照组为71.1%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组3例并发症,对照组12例并发症,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论相比常规胸穿抽液,胸腔积液引流手术治疗胸腔积液,疗效显著,且并发症少,安全可靠。Objective To compare the clinical effects of pleural effusion drainage and conventional thoracic puncture drainage in the treatment of pleural effusion. Methods 90 patients with pleural effusion were selected and divided into two groups according to the random number table method, 45 cases in each group. The control group was treated with conventional thoraco puncture drainage, and the study group was treated with drainage of pleural effusion to observe the clinical efficacy. Results The total effective rate of the study group was 91.1%, the control group was 71.1%, with statistical significance（P〈0.05）; the study group had 3 cases of complications and 12 cases in the control group, with statistical significance（P〈0.05）. Conclusion Compared with routine thoracic puncture drainage, pleural effusion drainage has a significant effect on pleural effusion, and has fewer complications and is safe and reliable.

关 键 词：胸腔积液引流手术 常规胸穿抽液 胸腔积液 胸膜反应 胸腔穿刺 疗效 

分 类 号：R656[医药卫生—外科学]