论《物权法》司法解释的整理与民法典物权编的完善  

Analysis of Supreme Court's Judicial Interpretations to Property Law and Amendment of Property Law in Draft Civil Code

作　　者：王文胜[1] Wang Wensheng

机构地区：[1]湖南大学法学院,湖南长沙410082

出　　处：《河南社会科学》2018年第9期45-50,共6页Henan Social Sciences

基　　金：湖南省普通高校哲学社会科学重点研究基地开放基金项目(17K023)

摘　　要：最高人民法院有关《物权法》的司法解释条文可分为简单解释型、澄清误解型、多义取舍型、具体细化型、漏洞填补型、裁量因素型等类型。在民法典编纂过程中,应对有关《物权法》的司法解释中的条文进行系统梳理,将其中的澄清误解型条文、多义取舍型条文、具体细化型条文和漏洞填补型条文取其合理者纳入民法典中。最迫切需要纳入民法典的是漏洞填补型条文和具体细化型条文,其次为多义取舍型条文,再次为澄清误解型条文;简单解释型条文虽也可适当纳入民法典之中,但紧迫性最弱;将《物权法》司法解释中的裁量因素型条文纳入民法典中加以规定的意义不大。According to the relationship between judicial interpretation and law, the provisions of Supreme Court＇s judicial interpretations to Property Law-can be divided into several types, including simple interpretation provisions, misunderstanding clarification provisions, muhiple implications selection provisions, rule specification provisions, gap-filling provisions, and discretion factors provisions. In the course of codification of civil code, it is necessary to analyze Supreme Court＇s judicial interpretations systemically, and adopt those reasonable misunderstanding clarification provisions, muhiple implications selection provisions, rule specification provisions and gap-filling provisions. The provisions of the latter two types are most urgent to be adopted. On the contrary, it has little significance to adopt the simple interpretation provisions and the discretion factors provisions.

关 键 词：民法典编纂 物权编 司法解释 立法技术 法律解释方法 

分 类 号：D9[政治法律—法学]