贪贿犯罪量刑公正难题之破解——基于100例贪污受贿案件刑事判决文书的实证分析  

Solving the problems of sentencing justice of embezzlement and bribery crimes: based on the empirical analysis of 100 judgments on embezzlement and bribery cases

作　　者：张兆松[1] 余水星 ZHANG Zhaosong;YU Shuixing(College of Law,Zhejiang University of Technology,Hangzhou 310023,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江工业大学法学院,浙江杭州310023

出　　处：《浙江工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第3期320-325,332,共7页Journal of Zhejiang University of Technology：Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(16BFX078)

摘　　要：贪贿犯罪量刑公正与否是检验和评价我国司法公正的重要依据之一。通过对100份贪贿犯罪判决文书进行梳理和分析发现:我国贪贿犯罪量刑存在轻刑化现象严重、量刑失衡问题突出、财产刑使用标准不统一、量刑情节适用不当等问题。主要原因在于司法人员误读宽严相济刑事政策、从宽量刑情节认定不严格、法官自由裁量权使用不当等。基于此,司法人员应当坚持从严反腐理念;对从宽量刑情节严格依法认定;从严控制缓刑、免刑适用;尽快制定全国统一的贪贿犯罪量刑指导意见;发布贪贿犯罪量刑指导案例。The fair sentence of embezzlement and bribery crimes is one of the important basis for testing and evaluating China’s judicial justice. Through sorting and analyzing 100 rulings on embezzlement and bribery crimes, it is found that there are serious problems such as light punishment, sentencing imbalances, inconsistent standards for the application of property penalties, and improper application of sentencing circumstances of embezzlement and bribery crimes in China. The main reason is that judges misunderstood the criminal policy of leniency and strictness such as the improper use of lenient punishment circumstances and discretionary power, and etc. Therefore, judicial staff should adhere to the strict anti-corruption idea, determine lenient circumstances strictly according to the law, strictly control the application of probation and exemption from punishment, establish a national unified guiding opinion on embezzlement and bribery, and publish guiding cases of embezzlement and bribery crimes.

关 键 词：贪贿犯罪 量刑失衡 量刑公正 量刑情节 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]