检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘祥宇 张俊杰 刘守强 曾一凡 闫佳伟 LIU Xiang-yu;ZHANG Jun-jie;LIU Shou-qiang;ZENG Yi-fan;YAN Jia-wei(National Engineering Research Center of Coal Mine Water Hazard Controlling,China University of Mining and Technology(Beijing),Beijing 100083,China)
机构地区:[1]中国矿业大学(北京)国家煤矿水害防治工程技术研究中心,北京100083
出 处:《煤炭技术》2018年第10期209-212,共4页Coal Technology
基 金:国家自然科学基金(41602262);大学生创新训练项目(C201602036)
摘 要:研究区1#煤层属于深部开采,且地质构造较为发育,底板突水危险性较高,为准确地评价1#煤层底板突水危险性,采用AHP型脆弱性指数法替代传统的突水系数法。在综合分析各种资料的基础上,选取6个主控因素进行研究,引用AHP构建模型进行权重分析,利用GIS建立专题图,经过数据归一、叠加后得到脆弱性分区。运用突水系数法进行二次突水危险性评价,并将2种结果进行比较。The No.1 coal seam in the study area belongs to deep mining and the geological structure is more developed,so the risk of water inrush is higher.In order to accurately evaluate the danger of water inrush from coal seam floor,the AHP vulnerability index method is adopted to replace the traditional water inrush coefficient method.Based on a comprehensive analysis of data,six control factors were selected and a model was constructed for weight analysis by AHP,GIS was used to construct a thematic map.After normalizing and overlaying,the division is obtained.The result was compared with another which obtained by the water inrush coefficient method.
分 类 号:TD745[矿业工程—矿井通风与安全]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15