PPP合同争议解决之司法路径  

The Judicial Path to the Settlement of PPP Contract Disputes

作　　者：付大学 Fu Daxue(Law School,Tianjin Polytechnic University,Tianjin 300387,China)

机构地区：[1]天津工业大学法学院,天津300387

出　　处：《上海财经大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2018年第5期17-29,共13页Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics

基　　金：中国法学会2017年度部级法学研究课题"我国反公地资源的识别与法律治理研究"(CLS2017D103)

摘　　要：PPP合同争议解决的司法路径之困源于PPP合同的定性之争与现有法院组织结构的固有缺陷。PPP合同争议解决的民—行二元选择,造成了当事人之间的诉讼地位难以平衡,以及公益保护的公地悲剧和反公地悲剧。欲找到解决困局的"阿里阿德涅之线",法院组织体系有必要作出调整,设立解决第三法域争议的专门法院——经济法院,将包括PPP合同争议在内的第三法域纠纷都纳入该法院管辖。针对PPP合同争议,经济法院应作出一些特殊程序安排:一方面,法院在特定情形下可追加消费者组织代表公共产品使用者作为第三人参加诉讼;另一方面,法院有权签发支付令让PPP合同责任方赔偿众多使用者的损失。The choice of the judicial path for the settlement of PPP contract disputes has become a hot issue in the current legislative and judicial practice. After combing the judgment of the previous judicial cases,it is found that the settlement of PPP contract disputes has two distinct paths in the legislative and judicial practice：one is solved by the administrative action through administrative litigation,and the other is solved by the civil action through civil litigation.Different judiciary paths cause judges and PPP participants to be confused because of the confusion of judicial practice,which will eventually affect the extensive implementation of the PPP mode. The dilemma of the judicial path for the settlement of PPP contract disputes is mainly from two reasons：on the one hand,the dispute of PPP contract attribute and the dualism of public and private,that is,under the dualism of public and private,the PPP contract is either a public law contract or a private law contract; on the other hand,the court’s public and private dual structure and the procedural law system,that is,the PPP dispute is either included in the administrative jurisdiction,or incorporated into the civil jurisdiction. The existing path of the settlement of PPP contract disputes causes the dilemma of litigant status between the parties,that is,it is difficult to allocate ＂positional goods＂ and it is difficult to restrain ＂status quo bias＂behavior tendency. At the same time,the existing path also leads to the dilemma of public interests protection,that is,the individual litigation will lead to the tragedy of common,and the aggregate litigation or public interest litigation will appear the tragedy of anticommon. The PPP contract has some common attributes of the public law contract and the private law contract,which is a typical public-private mixing contract. The settlement of PPP contract disputes has surpassed the single trial target under the administrative litigation or civil litigation. It also exceeds the interests of the par

关 键 词：PPP合同争议 司法路径 民行之争 经济法院 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]