检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨远秋[1] 刘泉[1] 陈长蓉[1] 汪善华[1] YANG Yuan-qiu;LIU Quan;CHEN Chang-rong;WANG Shan-hua(Fuling Central Hospital of Chongqing City,Fuling 408000,China)
出 处:《中国感染控制杂志》2018年第11期1013-1018,共6页Chinese Journal of Infection Control
摘 要:目的探讨科学有效的安全注射管理方法,为提高安全注射行为依从率、实现安全注射持续改进提供参考。方法制定安全注射专项工作方案,开展基线调查和安全注射相关培训,制定安全注射制度和标准操作规程,加强现场督导检查和考核,比较干预前(2016年5月基线调查)、干预后(2017年)安全注射设施配置合格率、理论考试成绩、行为依从率、锐器伤发生率等量化指标的变化。结果通过综合干预,全院安全注射各项设施配置率均>97%,各项医疗废物规范处置合格率均>93%,速干手消剂全院实际平均消耗量从(5.56±2.13)mL/床·日,增加至(9.95±5.38)mL/床·日;医院工作人员安全注射知识考试平均成绩由干预前的(71.20±12.22)分,上升至干预后的(92.59±5.99)分;干预前医务人员安全注射依从率为62.50%,干预后为88.53%,各组比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。一周内全院锐器伤例次上报率从干预前的15.79%上升至干预后的71.43%;全年各科室锐器伤例次发生率、每百住院日例次发生率分别从干预前的9.98%和0.0276%,下降至干预后的5.31%、0.0168%,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论有效的综合干预措施,可以强化安全注射意识,提高安全注射行为依从率,有效防范因非安全注射导致的医务人员职业伤害事件的发生,阻断医院感染传播。Objective To explore scientific and effective management methods for safe injection, provide reference for improving compliance rate of safe injection behavior and achieving continuous improvement in safe injection. Methods A special safety injection program was formulated, baseline survey and safe injection-related training were carried out, safe injection system and standard procedures were formulated, on-site supervision and examination were strengthened, quantitative indexes such as qualified rate of safe injection facilities, theoretical examination result, behavior compliance rate, and occurrence rate of sharp injury before intervention (baseline survey in May 2016) and after intervention (2017) were compared.Results Through comprehensive intervention, facilities allocation rates of safe injection in whole hospital were all〉97%, qualified rates of all medical waste disposal were all〉93%, actual average consumption of alcohol-based hand rub in the whole hospital increased from (5.56±2.13) mL/bed-day to (9.95±5.38)mL/bed-day; the average score of safety injection knowledge examination of health care workers(HCWs) increased from (71.20±12.22) before intervention to (92.59±5.99) after intervention; HCWs’ compliance rate to safe injection increased from 62.50% before intervention to 88.53% after intervention, difference were all statistically significant ( P 〈0.05). Reporting rate of sharp injuries in the whole hospital within a week increased from 15.79% before intervention to 71.43% after intervention; occurrence rate of case incidence of sharp injuries in the whole year and 100-day hospitalization decreased from 9.98% and 0.0276% before intervention to 5.31% and 0.0168% after intervention respectively, differences were both statistically significant (both P〈0.05 ).Conclusion Effective comprehensive intervention measures can strengthen the awareness of safe injection, improve compliance rate of safe injection behavior, effectively prevent the occurrence of
分 类 号:R197.323[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229