《伤寒论》抵当汤方名考证  

A textual research on formula name of Didang Tang(Resistance Decoction) in Shanghan Lun(Treatise on Cold Damage Diseases)

作　　者：曾凤[1] Zeng Feng(Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100029,China)

机构地区：[1]北京中医药大学,北京100029

出　　处：《北京中医药大学学报》2018年第9期731-733,共3页Journal of Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

基　　金：北京中医药大学国学院课题项目

摘　　要：通过对《伤寒论》抵当汤方名的考证,提示现今通行本《素问》《伤寒论》《千金要方》等经宋人整理改动,其文本材料在不同程度上偏离了原著原貌,具有明显的宋代医学特点;这些医书的相关内容存在诸多差异。这些文本材料的复杂性与不确定性,推测或源于宋人校理各书的体例、原则及校订过程、着力程度有所不同,或由于年代久远各书流传过程复杂、辗转翻刻而致。对关乎中医理、法、方、药的核心要素,特别是对长久以来歧义纷出、莫衷一是问题的研究考证,当建立在对文本材料充分了解的基础之上,切忌局限于某一文本而以偏概全。A textual research on formula name of Didang Tang（ Resistance Decoction） in Shanghan Lun（ Treatise on Cold Damage Diseases） indicates that the current versions of Suwen（ Plain Questions）,Shanghan Lun and Qianjin Yaofang（ Essential Prescriptions Worth a Thousand Gold） have been revised by scholars in the Song Dynasty. The textual materials of these works deviate original versions in varying degrees,and have obvious Song＇s medical characteristics. There are differences in content among these works. The complexity and uncertainty of these textual materials are speculated to be the result of the differences in styles,principles and emphases during revision procedure of these works by scholars in the Song Dynasty,or complex spreading process of them for a very long time and repeatedly reprinting of them. On the core concepts of theory, principles, formulas and medicinal in Chinese medicine,especially on those with ambiguities and without consensus through the ages,the textual research should be conducted on a firm grasp of different texts instead of relying on only one text.

关 键 词：伤寒论 抵当汤 考证 

分 类 号：R289.3[医药卫生—方剂学]