检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙晓哲 陈宗基[2] 顾永亮 Sun Xiaozhe1, Chen Zongji2, Gu Yongliang3(1. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Civil Aircraft Airworthiness and Maintenance, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China; 2. School of Automation Science and Electrical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China; 3. CNOOC Tianjin LNG Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300452, China)
机构地区:[1]中国民航大学天津市民用航空器适航与维修重点实验室,天津300300 [2]北京航空航天大学自动化科学与电气工程学院,北京100191 [3]中海油天津液化天然气有限责任公司,天津300452
出 处:《系统仿真学报》2018年第10期3957-3964,共8页Journal of System Simulation
基 金:中国民航大学科研启动基金(2011QD15X)
摘 要:对波音和空客系列四种先进机型(B777、B787、A340和A380)的电传容错飞行控制系统进行分析和比较,从软件可靠性和系统重构方面总结出波音和空客系列电传飞控系统的不足和有待改进的地方,并以此出发提出一套符合我国大型民机的余度容错飞控计算机系统新方案。将新方案与波音和空客方案从定性和定量方面进行比较分析,采用分层混合可靠性建模方法对三种方案进行可靠性建模和计算,由结果可得,新方案的可靠性高于波音和空客方案,并以简单的余度结构获得了较高的容错度;从民机的延迟维修和高派遣率要求上,新方案更具优势。The fault-tolerant Fly-By-Wire flight control systems of four advanced aircrafts of Boeing and Airbus series (B777, B787, A340 and A380) were analyzed and compared. The disadvantages needed to be improved were explored in terms of software reliability and system reconfiguration of Boeing and Airbus Fly-By-Wire flight control systems. A novel redundant fault-tolerant flight control computer (FCC) system was presented. The proposed FCC scheme was qualitatively and quantitatively compared with redundant FCC of Boeing and Airbus. The three schemes' reliability was modelled and evaluated through the hierarchical hybrid modelling method. The conclusions are obtained as follows: the proposed FCC of simpler structure has achieved higher reliability and fault tolerance ability; and the advantages of civil aircraft deferred maintenance and high dispatch rate requirements.
分 类 号:V249[航空宇航科学与技术—飞行器设计]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.21.186.117