国家治理与历史遗绪下的民族识别研究  

Ethnic Identification under the State Governance and Historical Heritage

作　　者：尚晴 SHANG Qing(Minzu University of China,Beijing 100081)

机构地区：[1]中央民族大学民族学与社会学学院,北京100081

出　　处：《中央民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2018年第5期29-36,共8页Journal of Minzu University of China(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"民国边疆民族区域政治史研究"(项目编号:18BZS125)阶段性成果之一

摘　　要：对当代中国民族识别的研究长期以来是西方当代中国研究领域的重点,也是国内学术界持续关注的问题。无论是被广泛讨论的根基论与建构论,还是中心与边缘叙事,似乎都缺乏从中国共产党民族观的形成与演变的基础上探讨该问题,亦即从发展脉络讨论相关问题。因为国共两党的民族观、民族政策都受到中国传统政治文化遗产和革命的影响,所以在民族学或人类学呈现的民族政治与文化多样性之外,中国的民族问题研究也需要历史向度。尤其在当下,我们除了要思考这些体系对民族分类的批判,更有必要反思话语体系形成的历史脉络。唯有这样的历史关照和现实关怀,方能在回应国内外民族问题研究的同时分析并呈现统一多民族国家的国家建构。Ethnic identification has been the focus of Western contemporary Chinese research for a long time,and it is still a concern in domestic academic community.Whether it was the basic theory and construction theoriy discussed in central and marginal narrations,the issue was not explored on the basis of the formation and evolution of the Chinese Communist Party＇s ethnic outlook,that is to say,standing in the long history to discuss the formation of the state.Because both of the ethnic outlook and ethnic policies of the KMT and the CPC are affected by Chinese traditional political and cultural heritage and revolution,so besides studying ethnic political and cultural diversity presented in ethnology or anthropology,the study of China＇s ethnic issues need a historical perspective.Especially in the current mainstream of the Western knowledge discourse system,we must not only consider its critique of ethnic classification,but also need to reflect on its historical development.Only through such a historical and realistic concern can we analyze and present the state construction of a unified multi-ethnic country while responding to the study on ethnic issues at home and abroad.

关 键 词：民族识别 民族政策 马列主义民族问题理论 中国传统政治文化 

分 类 号：C957[社会学—民族学]