检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李晓云[1] 王东红 安花花[1] 刘延彤 闫保华 张晓燕[1] 温晋 LI Xiaoyun;WANG Donghong;AN Huahua(Lanzhou General Hospital,Lanzhou 730050,China)
机构地区:[1]中国人民解放军兰州总医院
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2018年第10期1571-1574,共4页China Journal of Health Psychology
基 金:全军医药卫生科研基金项目(编号:CLZ13JA03、CLZ4JA06、CLZ4JB04)
摘 要:目的:探讨任务中期维和工兵心理弹性与心理应激、自我效能、应付方式的关系。方法:采用心理弹性问卷、军人心理应激自评问卷、一般自我效能感量表、应付方式问卷对113名任务中期维和工兵进行评估。结果:任务中期维和工兵心理弹性总分与已有相关研究无统计学意义差异(P〉0.05);高、中、低心理弹性组心理应激、自我效能、不成熟应付得分有显著差异(F_(max)=32.383,P〈0.001;F_(min)=4.882,P〈0.01),成熟应付、混合型应付得分无显著差异(P〉0.05);坚韧性、力量、心理弹性总分与心理应激、不成熟应付、混合应付呈显著负相关(r_(max)=-0.444,P〈0.01;r_(min)=-0.187,P〈0.05),与自我效能、成熟应付呈显著正相关(r_(max)=0.691,P〈0.01;r_(min)=0.252,P〈0.01),乐观性与自我效能、成熟应付呈显著正相关(r_(max)=0.417,P〈0.01;r_(min)=0.201,P〈0.05),与不成熟应付呈显著负相关(r=-0.286,P〈0.01),与心理应激、混合型应付相关不显著(P〉0.05);自我效能对心理弹性总分及3个因子有显著正向预测作用(F_(max)=101.277,P〈0.001;F_(min)=23.343,P〈0.001),不成熟应付对心理弹性总分及3个因子有显著负向预测作用(F_(max)=-61.874,P〈0.001;F_(min)=-13.993,P〈0.05)。结论:任务中期维和工兵的心理弹性水平尚可,可通过提高自我效能、减少不成熟应付方式提升官兵的心理弹性水平,从而促进其任务期心理素质的前移。Objective:To analyze the relationship of resilience and psychological stress,general self-efficacy,coping style for peacekeeping military engineers during mid-mission.Methods:A total of 113 peacekeeping military engineers were evaluated with Resilience Scale,Psychological Stress Self-evaluated Test,General Self-efficacy Scale and Coping Style Questionnaire.Results:There were not obviously differences on the total score of resilience between peacekeeping military engineers during mid-mission and other studies(P〉0.05);There were obviously differences on psychological stress,self-efficacy,immature coping style among high,medium and low group of resilience(F=4.882~32.383,P〈0.01);There were not obviously difference on mature coping style and mixing coping style(P〈0.05);Toughness,power,total scale of resilience were negatively correlated with psychological stress,immature coping style and mixing coping style(r=-0.444^-0.187,P〈0.05),and were positively correlated with self-efficacy and mature coping style(r=0.252~0.691,P〈0.01);Optimistic was positively correlated with self-efficacy and mature coping style(r=0.201~0.417,P〈0.05),and was negatively correlated with immature coping style(r=-0.286,P〈0.01),was not obviously correlated with psychological stress and mixing coping style(P〉0.05);Selfefficacy could positively predict total scale of resilience and three factors(F=23.343~101.277,P〈0.001),immature coping style could negatively predict total scale of resilience and three factors(F=-61.874^-13.993,P〈0.05).Conclusion:Resilience of peacekeeping military engineers during mid-mission is well,we can improve resilience of peacekeeping military engineers during mid-mission by improving self-efficacy and reducing immature coping style,which can promote psychological quality during performing the task
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.60.124