权利思维与执法权行使规范化——从“查身份证”事件切入  

Right Oriented Thinking and the Law Enforcement Power's Performance——From the Perspective of the Event of “Checking ID Card”

作　　者：濮艳[1] 刘翀[1] PU Yan;LIU Chong(The Communist Party＇s School in Wuhu City,Wuhu 241000,China)

机构地区：[1]中共芜湖市委党校,安徽芜湖241000

出　　处：《河南科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第5期99-104,共6页Journal of Henan University of Science & Technology(Social science)

基　　金：河南科技大学2017年度大学生研究训练计划(SRTP;2017177)

摘　　要："查身份证"事件揭示出,权利思维与权力思维是两种竞争性的思维方式,在价值取向和具体要求上差别甚大。执法者应确立权利思维观念,这对执法权的规范化行使大有裨益。实践中政治系统和法律系统错位所导致的"目标替代"和手段困境是权利思维难以在执法者群体中确立的重要因素。对权利思维及与之相因应的权利话语予以批评的主要是"后果论"和"社会资源论"。"后果论"与事实不符且颠倒了因果关系;"社会资源论"虽对微观问题颇有解释力度,但无力将自身正当化,只应做为权利思维的补充而存在。The event of ‘checking ID card’ indicated that right oriented thinking and power oriented thinking are two competitive modes of thinking, distinguished in value orientation and concrete requirements. Establishing right oriented thinking will be helpful for the law enforcer’ power performing regularly. “Purpose substitution” and means dilemma which brought about by the dislocation between political and legal system are two main obstacles to establish this mode of thinking. “Consequence theory” and “resource theory” criticized right oriented thinking, but the former doesn’t conform to the fact and confused causality, the latter is unable to justify itself and should exist as a supplement to the right oriented thinking only in legislation.

关 键 词：权利思维 执法权 社会资源论 

分 类 号：D901[政治法律—法学理论]