制度掣肘与供给不足:中国知识产权学科向何处去  

Institutional Constraint and Insufficient Supply: A Discussion on the Disciplinary Construction of Intellectual Property in China

作　　者：朱雪忠 杨静[2] 

机构地区：[1]同济大学上海国际知识产权学院 [2]云南财经大学法学院

出　　处：《知识产权》2018年第10期24-32,共9页Intellectual Property

摘　　要：中国现行学科建制模式下,知识产权学科发展面临生存性危机,与知识产权事业的蓬勃发展以及社会的巨大需求形成强烈反差。知识产权学科困境一方面源自于外在的制度掣肘——不尽合理的学科设置制度带来的整体性危机,另一方面则归因于学科自身的供给不足——知识产权学科内在理论知识系统尚不成熟。在传统学科评判标准已不能适应大科学时代学科变化趋势、创新型国家建设全面开启的语境下,以知识产权强国建设的重大需求牵引,推进学理自洽,促进行政协调,官、学、民、商、媒各方协同配合,同频共振,最终建成知识产权一级学科是化解学科危机、扭转学科困境、赢得生存发展空间的理性选择,也是知识产权强国建设的迫切现实需求。Under the current Chinese disciplinary formation, the intellectual property discipline faces a survival crisis, which sharply contrasts to the vigorous development of intellectual property undertakings and the great demand of society. There are two reasons for the dilemma of intellectual property discipline： first, the institutional constraint, meaning the unreasonable disciplinary setting system is causing the holistic crisis; second, the insufficient supply of the discipline itself, meaning the inherent theoretical knowledge system of intellectual property discipline is not yet mature. While the traditional standards on disciplinary evaluation are no longer adaptable to the trend of great science development, and that the construction of an innovative country has been rolling out, it is a rational choice to develop intellectual property into the first-level discipline, per the urgent needs of constructing a strong IP country. To this end, the government, academia, civilians, market, and media should join hands, endeavoring to resolve the current crisis in intellectual property disciplinary development.

关 键 词：知识产权 知识产权学科 学科划分 制度掣肘 供给不足 一级学科 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]