检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋健[1]
机构地区:[1]江苏省高级人民法院知识产权庭
出 处:《知识产权》2018年第10期33-39,共7页Intellectual Property
摘 要:近年来,我国商标申请注册量极速攀升,除正常商业使用需求外,更多增量来自不以使用为目的的恶意抢注、恶意囤积,以及为防止被诉侵权,许多企业不得已大量进行的防御性注册。商标制度失序异化的结果,极大增加了企业营运成本,造成商标行政司法资源的极大耗费,亦助长了商标领域日趋严重的不诚信行为。本文通过两则典型案例,探析禁止商标权滥用原则的内涵和商标权滥用的构成要件,提出要更加明确禁止权利滥用的司法指引,通过加强商标权滥用案件的裁判,加大相关损害赔偿责任力度,推动驰名商标认定的理性回归,实现有效遏制商标权恶意注册及其滥用的政策目标。The number of trademark registrations soars up for the past few years. Except for commercial use, a great part of the increased registrations are for purposes, such as malicious hoarding, other than normal use; or for defensive purposes. The alienation of trademark registration rules results in high operation costs for enterprises and great waste of trademark administrative and judicial resources, and encourages dishonest registration, which grows very serious in the Trademark Law feld. By analyzing two typical cases, the paper tries to explore the connotation of trademark rights abuse prohibition principle and the constitutive requirements of trademark rights abuse. The paper proposes to clarify the judicial guidance for prohibiting trademark rights abuse. By stressing the adjudication of cases concerning trademark right abuse and aggravating the amount of damages for trademark abuse liability, the rationality of well-known trademark recognition system will be brought back to its nature, to effectively restrain malicious trademark registration and trademark right abuse.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222