检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭丽萍 冯霞[1] 钟丽娟 Peng Liping;Feng Xia;Zhong Lijuan(Zhejiang Provincal People's Hospital,Hangzhou Zhejiang 310014,China)
机构地区:[1]浙江省人民医院杭州医学院附属人民医院,浙江杭州310014
出 处:《齐鲁护理杂志》2018年第20期8-10,共3页Journal of Qilu Nursing
摘 要:目的:探讨针对性护理干预在原发性肝癌患者围术期中的应用效果。方法:将152例原发性肝癌患者随机分为观察组和对照组各76例,对照组采用常规护理措施,观察组实施针对性护理干预,比较两组护理前后焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分、患者生存质量评分及围术期感染情况。结果:观察组患者护理后SAS、SDS评分均明显低于对照组(P <0. 05);观察组患者护理后躯体功能、社会功能、心理功能、自评评分及生存质量总评分均明显高于对照组(P <0. 05);观察组患者术后感染率明显低于对照组(P <0. 05)。结论:针对性护理干预可有效改善原发性肝癌患者的不良情绪,提高生存质量,降低术后感染率。Objective To explore the effect of targeted nursing intervention in perioperative period of patients with primary liver cancer.Methods: A total of 152 patients with primary liver cancer were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 76 cases in eachgroup. The control group was given routine nursing measures and the observation group was given pertinent nursing intervention. The scoresof selfrating anxiety scale( SAS) , selfrating depression scale( SDS) , quality of life( QOL) and perioperative infection were compared between the two groups. Results: The SAS and SDS scores of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group( P 〈 0. 05) . The physical function, social function, psychological function, selfevaluation score and quality of life score of the observationgroup were significantly higher than those of the control group( P 〈 0. 05) ; The postoperative infection rate of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group( P 〈 0. 05) . Conclusion: Targeted nursing intervention can effectively improve the negativemood of patients with primary liver cancer, improve the quality of life and reduce the postoperative infection rate.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.4