检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张琳[1,2] 田军 党创寅[2] 冯英杰[2] ZHANG Lin;TIAN Jun;DANG Chuangyin;FENG Yingjie(School of Management,Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an 710049,China;Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management,City University of Hong Kong,Hong Kong,China)
机构地区:[1]西安交通大学管理学院,西安710049 [2]香港城市大学系统工程与工程管理系,香港
出 处:《系统工程理论与实践》2018年第10期2611-2619,共9页Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基 金:国家自然科学基金重大项目(71390331);国家自然科学基金(71171157)~~
摘 要:政府作为社会安全和社会福利保障的责任者,需要监管企业合规储备和轮换更新应急物资与设备的行为,但常常因为受制于企业储备信息不透明而导致监管效果不理想.本文针对应急物资周期性轮换更新这一敏感问题,建立了政府和企业的博弈模型,分析了一类质量或性能随时间下降的应急物资和设备按期轮换更新行为的监管策略,采用基于经验学习的强化学习算法求得政企博弈均衡解.算例分析结果验证了经验学习方法解决这一类问题(道德风险问题)的有效性.通过对比分析不同社会损失水平下的企业轮换更新行为和政府监管模式,进一步提出了相应的应对措施,从而对于这一问题的有效解决,提供了较好的管理启示.Government, who has a primary stake in social safety and welfare,undertakes the task of monitoring enterprises to make sure that they reserve and replace emergency supplies and equipment as required. Nevertheless, the reality is unsatisfactory, which is caused by the hidden information about the reserves' quality and performance. This paper considers a kind of emergency supplies and equipment that are needed to be replaced periodically to guarantee their usability and availability. A government-enterprise game model is established to analyze the enterprise's shirking behaviors and the government 's monitoring strategies. The experience based equilibria are generated from a reinforcement learning algorithm. Results demonstrate the effectiveness of utilizing the experience-learning method to solve this kind of moral hazard problem. This study further puts forward managerial implications by analyzing enterprise's replacement strategies and government's monitoring patterns when the enterprise faces different levels of social losses.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.151