检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:苏海涛[1] 翟江辉 邱彦深 Su Haitao;Zhai Jianghui;Qiu Yanshen(College of Economics and Management,Nanchang University,Nanchang 330031,China;Sanxin Medical Technology Co.,Ltd.,Nanchang 330200,China)
机构地区:[1]南昌大学经济与管理学院,江西南昌330031 [2]三鑫医疗科技有限公司,江西南昌330200
出 处:《工业工程》2018年第5期18-23,共6页Industrial Engineering Journal
基 金:江西省研究生创新专项项目(YC2017-S028);国家自然科学基金资助项目(51765043)
摘 要:评价不同企业员工玩性人格对团队创新行为效率的影响程度。针对创新行为多方面输出、玩性人格多种类输入的特点,使用层次分析法(AHP)转化多种因素成相应的综合指标;利用数据包络分析(DEAP、编程排序)评价各个企业的综合创新行为效率。结果表明:长安、格力、海能达、华宇四个企业玩性人格控制较好,其他企业都处于规模报酬递增状态。在此基础上,以长安汽车作为标杆企业,对其他企业玩性人格的影响行为提出合理的对策。A research is conducted into evaluating the degree of influence of employee personality of different companies on the efficiency of team innovation. Aiming at the characteristics of multi-facet output of innovation behavior and multi-type input of playful personality, AHP is used to transform various factors into corresponding comprehensive indicators, and data envelopment analysis (DEAP, programming sequencing) is used to evaluate the comprehensive innovation of each enterprise behavioral efficiency. The results show that: the four companies under research, i. e. Cbangan, Gree, Hainengda, and Huayu, have good control of playful personality, and other companies are in a state of increasing returns to scale. On this basis, taking Changan Automobile as a benchmarking company, reasonable countermeasures for the influence behaviors of other enterprises' playful personality and for the improvement of the company' s innovative behavior are proposed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229