过失犯归责问题再探  

Further Exploration on the Problem of Liability for Negligent Offense

作　　者：郝川[1] 詹惟凯 Hao Chuan;Zhan Weikai

机构地区：[1]西南大学法学院,重庆400715

出　　处：《法学杂志》2018年第10期85-91,共7页Law Science Magazine

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"我国量刑改革的反思和调整问题研究"(项目编号:13CFX044);西南大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助"刑事法学基础理论重塑与应用研究--对刑事司法实践重大疑难问题的回应"(项目编号:SWU1709126)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：过失犯作为典型的结果犯,欲对其归责需在义务违反行为与结果之间建立起明确有效的规范关联。在具体判断时,运用"合义务替代行为"的思维方式,在类型化基础上适用不同的判定规则,基于对罪刑法定原则、罪疑唯轻原则的坚持,选择以"确定能够避免说"为主导,以"风险升高理论"为例外。Negligent crime is a typical mold of consequential offense,which means there must be a certain connection between the result and the conduct if the result can be attributed to the perpetrator. Alternative behavior of performing duties is a thinking method to solve the problem.The conduct should be attributed only when complying with the prudent duties can certainly avoid the result because of the principle of legality and the doctrine of non-existence of doubted guilt,therefore,the risk-increasing theory can only be an exception.

关 键 词：过失犯 规范关联 结果避免可能性 合义务替代行为 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]