检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵华丽 徐凤娇 郭永玉 舒首立[5] ZHAO Hua-li;XU Feng-jiao;GUO Yong-yu;SHU Shou-li(School of Psychology,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China;Xiangyang No.5 Middle School,Xiangyang 441057,China;Shanghai Educational Publishing House,Shanghai 201906,China;School of Psychology,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China;Institute of Educational Science,Anhui Normal University,Wuhu 241000,China)
机构地区:[1]华中师范大学心理学院,武汉430079 [2]襄阳市第五中学,襄阳441057 [3]上海教育出版社,上海201906 [4]南京师范大学心理学院,南京210023 [5]安徽师范大学教育科学学院,芜湖241000
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2018年第5期841-846,共6页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(71171094)
摘 要:目的:通过两个研究来探讨社会阶层与亲社会行为的关系。方法:研究一采用独裁者实验范式,考查亲社会行为是否受到亲社会行为施予者和接受者阶层的影响。研究二同时考查两种不同的亲社会行为类型:助人与合作。结果:研究一发现高阶层者会比低阶层者表现出更多的亲社会行为,低阶层者会得到更多的亲社会行为,施与者和接受者社会阶层的交互效应不显著。研究二发现,三项交互作用显著:施予者和接受者的阶层对助人行为的影响与研究一相同;而在合作行为中,如果合作对象是低阶层者,高阶层者比低阶层有更多的合作行为,但当合作对象是高阶层者时,却没有体现出阶层差异。结论:两个研究共同表明,存在着亲社会行为的阶层差异,这种阶层差异会受到亲社会行为类型的调节。Objective: In our study, we investigated the relationship between social class and prosocial behavior in two studies. Methods: The first study adopted the "dictator game" to test whether the prosocial behavior of different social classes was affected by the recipient' s social class. The second study took two types of prosocial behavior into account: help- ing and cooperation. Results: The result of the first study indicated that the people of upper class were inclined to show more prosocial behavior than the lower ones; the lower ones were more likely to receive prosocial behavior. No significant in- teractions between social class of prosocial behavior givers and recipients was observed. The result of the second study indi- cated that a significant interaction between social class of prosocial behavior givers and recipients and the types of prosocial behaviors. However, as for the cooperation behavior, when the partner was a high class individual, both the upper class and lower class showed more cooperation behavior, no significant difference was found between social classes; but when the part- ner was a lower class individual, upper class showed more cooperation behavior than lower class. Conclusion: Prosocial be- havior is influenced by social classes, which may be moderated by the type of prosocial behavior.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229