检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐韦云 汪作为[2] 茅荣杰[2] 薛志强 熊金霞[2] 崔桃桃[2] 李川 史泊海[2] 周建芳[2] 黄丹琪[2] 王亚 XU Wei-yun;WANG Zuo-wei;MAO Rong-jie,;XUE Zhi-qiang;XIONG Jin-xia;CUI Tao-tao;LI Chuan;SHI Bo-hai;ZHOU Jian-fang;HUANG Dan-qi;WANG Ya(CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health,Institute of Psychology,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100101,China;Shanghai Hongkou District Mental Health Center,Shanghai 200083,China)
机构地区:[1]中国科学院心理研究所心理健康重点实验室,北京100101 [2]上海市虹口区精神卫生中心,上海200083
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2018年第5期887-890,1043,共5页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:国家重点研发计划(2016YFC1307105);上海市医学重点专科建设计划(ZK2015A06);上海市虹口区医疗卫生重点专科建设项目(虹科委[2014]16号);上海卫生计生系统重要薄弱学科建设项目(2015ZB0405);第四轮上海市公共卫生三年行动计划项目(GWⅣ-6);上海市虹口区医学科研课题项目(虹卫1603-34);上海市卫生和计划生育委员会科研课题计划(项目编号:201440327)资助
摘 要:目的:检验精神分裂症复发先兆量表(early signs scale, ESS)中文版(ESS-C)的效度和信度。方法:应用ESS-C对200例社区慢性精神分裂症患者(社区稳定组)和60例复发住院患者(复发入院组)进行评估,2周后抽取30例社区患者重测。结果:验证性因素分析表明原量表的四因子结构拟合指数为CFI=0.83,TLI=0.82,SRMR=0.056,RMSEA=0.084。各维度的因子负荷范围为焦虑0.545-0.753;抑郁/退缩0.563-0.760;失控/兴奋0.462-0.757;初始的精神病性表现0.566-0.790。ESS-C的内容效度(CVI)为0.92,所有条目的CVI值均在0.80-1.00范围内。组间比较Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验结果显示复发入院组的量表总分显著高于社区稳定组。总量表内部一致性Cronbachα系数为0.966,各因子Cronbachα系数为0.813-0.922;总量表、各因子的重测信度在0.724-0.921之间。结论:最终形成的ESS-C量表内容效度、效标效度及信度良好,结构效度可接受但不够理想。Objective: To translate the Early Signs Scale(ESS) into Chinese and to test the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the ESS(ESS-C). Methods: Two-hundred community stable schizophrenia patients and 60 relapsed in patients with schizophrenia were administered the ESS-C. Two weeks later, 30 community patients were administered the ESS-C again. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the 4-factor structure showed acceptable but not ideal goodness-of-fit, the indices were CFI=0.83, TLI=0.82, SRMR=O.056, RMSEA=0.084. The factor loads of each factor were 0.545-0.753 for anxiety/agitation, 0.563-0.760 for depression/withdrawal, 0.462-0.757 for disinhibition, 0.566-0.790 for incipient/psychosis. The mean content validity(CVI) for ESS-C was 0.92, CVI for each item ranged from 0.80-1.00. The Cronbach' s α was 0.966 for the whole scale, and ranged from 0.813 to 0.922 for each factor. The test-retest reliability ranged from 0.724 to 0.921 for factor scores and total score. Conclusion: The ESS-C showed good content validity, criteri- on validity and reliability, the structure validity was acceptable but not ideal.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117