检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵兴蓉[1,2] 曹玉萍[1] 陈壮飞 康传媛 刘瑞湘[5] 白俊云[6] 张亚林[1] ZHAO Xing-rong;CAO Yu-ping;CHEN Zhuang-fei;KANG Chuan-yuan;LIU Rui-xiang;BAI Jun-yun;ZHANG Ya-lin(Mental Health Institute,the Second Xiangya Hospital,Central South University,Changsha 410011,China;Department of Psychiatry,The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University,Kunming 650032,China;Medical Faculty,Kunming University of Science and Technology,Kunming 650504,China;Department of Clinical Psychology,East Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University,Shanghai 200120,China;Department of Clinical Psychology,The Second People's Hospital of Yunnan Province,Kunming 650021,China;Department of Geriatrics,The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University,Kunming 650032,China)
机构地区:[1]中南大学湘雅二医院精神卫生研究所,长沙410011 [2]昆明医科大学第一附属医院精神科,昆明650032 [3]昆明理工大学医学院,昆明650504 [4]同济大学附属东方医院临床心理科,上海200120 [5]云南省第二人民医院临床心理科,昆明650021 [6]昆明医科大学第一附属医院老年病科,昆明650032
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2018年第5期1044-1048,1037,共6页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:国家自然科学基金地区基金(基金号:31760281);国家自然科学基金青年基金(31300926)
摘 要:目的:探讨团体现实疗法对首发轻中度广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)患者的疗效。方法:采用前瞻性对照研究方法,将69名GAD患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,治疗组参加8周团体现实疗法治疗,两组在基线与8周后分别测评汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、内控性、有势力的他人及机遇量表(IPCS)、应付方式问卷、自尊量表(SES)和幸福感指数;此外,治疗组在第2、4、6周复测HAMA。结果:8周后治疗组HAMA总分和分量表分均明显低于对照组(P<0.01));"内控性"、应付方式中"解决问题"和"求助"、SES及幸福感指数评分均显著高于对照组,"有势力的他人"、"退避"评分显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。与基线评分相比,治疗组HAMA总分和精神性焦虑从第2周显著减低(P<0.05),躯体性焦虑从第4周显著降低(P<0.05)。结论:团体现实疗法对轻中度GAD患者的焦虑症状疗效显著,精神焦虑改善早于躯体焦虑症状,患者内控力、积极应对方式的应用、自尊和幸福感均提高。Objective: To explore the effects of group reality therapy for the first episode patients with mild to moderate generalized anxiety disorder(GAD). Methods: Sixty-nine patients with first-onset mild to moderate GAD were randomly di- vided into the therapy group and the control group. The therapy group attended group reality therapy for 8 weeks, all the par- ticipants were measured at baseline and 8 weeks later respectively using Hamilton anxiety Scale(HAMA), Hamilton depres- sion Scale(HAMD), Internality, Powerful Others and Chance Scale(IPCS), Coping Style Questionnaire, self-esteem Scale (SES), and well-being index. All the participants were tested by HAMA in the second, fourth, sixth week respectively. Re- sults: Compared with the scores of the two groups after $ weeks, the scores of HAMA and psychiatric anxiety and somatic anxiety were significantly lower than the control group(P〈O.O1); the internality score of 1PCS, the solving problem and seek- ing help scores of Coping Style Questionnaire, SES and well-being scores of the therapy group were significantly higher than the control group(P〈O.05), while the Powerful Others score of IPCS, the withdrawal score of Coping Style Questionnaire of the therapy group were significantly lower than the control group(P〈0.05), The scores of HAMA and psychogenic anxiety decreased significantly from the second week(P〈O.05), while somatic anxiety score decreased significantly from the fourth week(P〈O.05). Conclusion: Group reality therapy is effective for the treatment of anxiety symptoms in patients with mild to moderate GAD. The development of psychogenic anxiety is earlier than somatic anxiety. After treatment, the internal control ability of the patient improved, and they adopt more positive coping style, and their self-esteem and happiness & life satis- faction also increase.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222