检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁德荣[1] 徐楠[1] 苗佳[1] 张辉明[1] 郑经川[2] 干梦九[2] 李佩璋[3] 张楚[3]
机构地区:[1]华西医科大学附属第一医院国家药品临床研究基地,成都610041 [2]浙江医科大学附一院,杭州310003 [3]浙江省杭州市第一人民医院,杭州310006
出 处:《华西医学》2000年第4期423-426,共4页West China Medical Journal
摘 要:应用两种国产洛美沙星胶囊治疗急性细菌性感染 40 5例 ,其中随机对照组 10 3对、开放试验组 199例。两药均为 2 0 0mg每日两次口服 ,疗程 7~ 14日。结果表明 ,试验组与对照组的痊愈率和有效率分别为 76 70 %与80 5 8%和 95 15 %与 92 2 3%。细菌清除率分别为 90 2 0 %与 90 91%。以上结果组间比较均无统计学差异 (P >0 0 5 )。开放组痊愈率和有效率分别为 79 40 %与 93 47% ,细菌清除率为 96 15 %。试验组与对照组的不良反应发生率分别为 6 80 %与 5 83% (P >0 0 5 ) ,开放组为 5 0 3%。不良反应多呈轻度 ,勿需处理可自行缓解。以上结果提示 ,两种国产洛美沙星胶囊同样安全、有效。The efficacy and safety of domestic lomefloxacin were evaluated and 405 patients were enrolled in the randomized controlled study.Another domestic lomefloxacin was chosen as a control drug.Both drugs were administered 200mg,twice a day for 7~14 days.In the controlled trial,206 cases were randomized to receive one of the two kinds of lomefloxcin (103 cases in each group).The cure rates and the efficacy rates were 76 70%,80 58% and 95 15%,92 23% respectively.The bacterial clearance rates were 90 20% and 90 91%.There were no significant differences of the above results between the two groups ( P >0 05)。199 patients entered the open trial.Its cure rate,efficacy rate and bacterial clearance rate were 79 40%,93 47% and 96 15% respectively.The side-effect rates of the three groups were 6 80%,5 83% and 5 03%.There was no statistical difference between the controlled groups ( P >0 05)。Most of the adverse drug reactions were mild.This study suggests that both of the domestic lomefloxacin are effective and well tolerated.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.14.252.84