检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王琴[1] 李佑英[1] 王丹萍 Wang Qin;Li Youying;Wang Danping(Bureau of Hangzhou Public Security,HangZhou,ZheJiang,31000,China)
机构地区:[1]杭州市公安局刑事科学技术研究所,浙江杭州310002
出 处:《中国法医学杂志》2018年第5期518-519,共2页Chinese Journal of Forensic Medicine
摘 要:目的比较GlobalFiler、PowerPlex 21及Identifiler Plus3种PCR扩增试剂盒对陈旧口腔拭子的检验效率。方法采用硅珠法提取150份保存7-13年陈旧口腔拭子的DNA,分别用GlobalFiler、PowerPlex 21及Identifiler Plus试剂盒进行扩增检测,比较分析所得分型数据。结果在150份降解样本的检验结果中,GlobalFiler试剂盒21个常染色体STR基因座有效分型检出率为76%,PowerPlex 21试剂盒20个STR基因座检出率为74.93%,Identifiler Plus所含的15个STR基因座检出率为77.56%。结论对于陈旧口腔拭子检材,Identifiler Plus检验成功率最高,需要更多基因座时,GlobalFiler优于PowerPlex 21。Objective To compare the performances of GlobalFiler kit, PowerPlex 21 kit and Identifiler Plus kit in aged buccal swabs profling. Methods DNA were extracted from 150 aged buccal swabs by silica-beadsmethod. The DNA were amplified by the GlobalFiler, PowerPlex 21 and Identifiler Plus separately and profiled through the GeneMapper ID-X. Results 76%of 21 autosomal loci were successfully typed by GlobalFiler kit in degraded samples, 74.93% of 20 autosomal loci were successfully typed by PowerPlex 21 kit in degraded samples, 77.56%of 15 autosomal loci were successfully typed by Identifiler Plus kit in degraded samples. Conclusions The highest detection rate was achieved using Identifiler Plus kit, when more loci are required, GlobalFiler kit is more suitable than PowcrPlex 21 kit in typing aged buccal swabs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15