检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:葛淼 Ge Miao
机构地区:[1]复旦大学法学院,上海200438
出 处:《行政与法》2018年第10期108-117,共10页Administration and Law
摘 要:人类基因有伦理性和社会性,对于不涉及人类创造性活动的原生基因发现不应授予专利权。对于发现权与发明权的区分,并非只要存在人类劳动就认可其发明专利性质,还应当考虑人类创造性劳动的参与程度。专利权扩张易引发社会负效应,必须考虑其社会效应和权益平衡问题。从知识产权的性质和目的而论,单纯的科学发现不应给予专利权保护,但应考虑在传统专利垄断权以外给予科学发现权利人其他形式的补偿,以达到社会福利和个人利益的相互协调。The human gene has its particularity.It can not be judged by the standard of the general patentable object.It also needs to be evaluated in combination with the social effect.The distinction between the right to discovery and the right to invention is not to recognize the nature of the invention patent as long as there is human labor,and the degree of participation of human labor should be considered.The scientific discovery should not give the protection of the patent right, but should consider other forms of compensation for the scientific discovery of the right holder outside the monopoly of the traditional patent.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15