检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑红琴 王莉[1] ZHENG Hong-qin;WANG Li
机构地区:[1]江苏省苏北人民医院神经内科,扬州市225000
出 处:《护理实践与研究》2018年第21期151-152,共2页Nursing Practice and Research
摘 要:目的探讨序贯康复护理干预对脑卒中患者认知功能和自我效能恢复的影响。方法选取我院2016年12月至2017年12月收治88例脑卒中患者作为本次调查对象,将其随机等分为研究组和对照组,对照组患者实施常规护理,研究组患者实施序贯康复护理干预,对比两组患者接受不同护理模式后慢性病自我效能量表(CDSES)和简明精神状态检查量表(MMSE)的评分。结果干预前,两组患者CDSES和MMSE评分比较差异无统计学意义(P> 0. 05);干预后,研究组患者CDSES各项评分及MMSE评分均明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05)。结论脑卒中患者通过实施序贯康复护理干预可有效提高患者认知功能和自我效能,提高患者康复效果。Objective To explore the effect of sequential rehabilitation nursing intervention on cognitive function and self - efficacy recovery in stroke patients. Methods To compare the scores of chronic disease self - efficacy scales(CDSES) and mini - mental state examination(MMSE) after receivingdifferent interventions, 88 cases of stroke patients admitted to our hospital from December 2016 to December 2017 were observed, and randomly divided into study group and control group with equal members. The control group adopted routine nursing, while the study group adopted sequential rehabilitation nursing intervention. Results Before intervention, the difference of CDSES and MMSE scores between the two groups had no statistical significance(P 〉 0. 05).After intervention, the scores of CDSES in respective dimension and scores of MMSE in the study group were apparently higher than those in the control group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P 〈 0. 05). Conclusion The application of sequential rehabilitation nursing intervention on stroke patients could effectively improve their cognitive function and self - efficacy, which had remarkable effect on the recovery of patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3