检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:阚晓西[1] 易赟 刘宝军 Kan Xiaoxi;Yi Yun;Liu Baojun
机构地区:[1]财政部金融司
出 处:《财政科学》2018年第9期40-46,共7页Fiscal Science
摘 要:针对我国担保机构定位不清、机构资本规模较小、担保主业盈利性差、再担保分险功能和稳定器作用有待加强、风险收益不对等、融资担保行业行政干预较多等问题,本文对法国、德国、日本、韩国的融资担保体系建设情况进行了梳理和比较分析,并提出要明确融资担保体系的政策性定位、完善利益融合的风险分担机制、建立持续输血的风险补偿机制、发挥国家融资担保基金的龙头带动作用、用好绩效考核指挥棒等政策建议。There are quite a few problems existed in China's government financing guarantee system, such problems including that no clear role of China guarantee institute, small capital of the institutions, poor profit from the guarantee business, weak function and its stability role of re-guarantee, imbalance between risk and benefit, quite a few administrative interference in financing guarantee industry. The thesis chooses the financing guarantee system constructions of such countries as France, Germany, Japan, South Korea, compares their prac- tices. Then it presents such recommendations as clarifying the policy role of financing guarantee system, improving the risk-sharing system based on benefit integration, setting up a risk compensation system to encourage continuous capital input, helping state financing guarantee function as a leader, and letting performance assessment system play its role.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38