检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:崔娟[1] CUI Juan(Infectious Management Department,Jinan Infectious Disease Hospital,Jinan,Shandong Province,250021 China)
机构地区:[1]山东省济南市传染病医院感染管理科,山东济南250021
出 处:《中国卫生产业》2018年第30期19-21,共3页China Health Industry
摘 要:目的探讨风险管理在ICU医院感染控制中的作用。方法选取从2017年2—12月期间在ICU接受治疗的患者50例,随机分为常规组与观察组,25例/组。常规组患者实施常规管理,观察组患者则在常规基础上介入风险管理模式,对比两组患者各项指标感染发生率。结果常规组患者气管切开肺部感染率为40%,而观察组为12%;常规组患者呼吸机相关性肺炎感染率为48%,而观察组患者为20%;统计感染发生率,常规组为88%,而观察组为64%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论风险管理在ICU中实施,可有效地分析感染危险因素,及时采取相应措施,控制了感染率的发生。Objective To study the effect of risk management in the infection control of ICU hospital. Methods 50 cases of patients treated in ICU in our hospital from February to December 2017 were randomly divided into two groups with 25 cases in each, the routine group used the routine management, while the observation group used the interventional risk management model on the basis of the routine management, and the incidence rate of various indexes was compared between the two groups. Results The incidence rate of tracheal infection in the conventional and observation group was 40% and 12% respectively; the ventilator-associated pneumonia infection rate in the conventional group was 48%, which was evidently higher than that in the observation group (20%); the incidence rate of infection in the conventional group (88%) was higher as compared to the observation group (64%), and all the differences were statistically significant (P〈0.05). Conclusion The implementation of risk management in ICU can effectively analyze the infection risk factors, and control the occurrence of infection rate and reduce the occurrence of adverse events by using the corresponding measures in time.
分 类 号:R197.323[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28