专利侵权诉讼举证制度之审视与重构  

Review and Reconstruct the System of Proof of Patent Infringement Lawsuit

作　　者：袁秀挺[1] YUAN Xiuting(Law School,Tongji University,Shanghai 20009)

机构地区：[1]同济大学法学院,上海200092

出　　处：《中国发明与专利》2018年第10期53-61,共9页China Invention & Patent

基　　金：国家知识产权局软科学项目"实施严格的专利保护制度研究"(项目编号:SS16-C-27)的部分研究成果

摘　　要：专利侵权诉讼的举证可分为三个环节:专利权属的举证、是否侵权的举证以及损害赔偿的举证。其中,涉及新产品的方法专利侵权以及侵权损害赔偿额的证明是实践中的难点。为破解"赔偿低"的难题,除改进赔偿制度外,应重点完善举证规则及其适用。当前,应充分利用举证妨碍制度并适当借鉴证据开示的做法。二者不属于举证责任的特殊安排,实践应用时要求法官正确把握证明标准。The proof of patent infringement suit can be divided into three stages： the proof of the patent right, the proof of infringement and the proof of damages. Among them, how to proof the infringement of process patent relating to new products and the compensation for infringement damages are the diffi culties in practice. To solve the problem of ＂low compensation＂, in addition to improving the compensation system, we should focus on improving the rules of burden of proof and their application. At present, we should make full use of the regime of proof obstruction and learn from the regime of discovery of evidence. The two methods are not reversion of the burden of proof, the judge should correctly grasp the proof standard in practice.

关 键 词：专利侵权 赔偿低 举证难 举证妨碍 证据开示 

分 类 号：D923.42[政治法律—民商法学]