检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘慧青[1] 柴希栋 许春梅[1] 蔡丽 Liu Huiqing;Chai Xidong;Xu Chunmei;Cai Li(Jinchang Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Jinchang 737100,Gansu,China;Yongchang County Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Yongchang 737200,Gansu,China)
机构地区:[1]金昌市疾病预防控制中心,甘肃金昌737100 [2]永昌县疾病预防控制中心,甘肃永昌737200
出 处:《中国疫苗和免疫》2018年第5期589-592,共4页Chinese Journal of Vaccines and Immunization
摘 要:目的对金昌市儿童免疫规划(EPI)疫苗接种率的可靠性进行评价。方法采用TOPSIS和RSR法相结合的方法,比较金昌市2008-2017年儿童EPI疫苗基础免疫接种率。结果 TOPSIS显示2017年儿童疫苗接种率最优,2008年最差,且2012-2017年明显优于2008-2011年;RSR法显示,2014-2017年为优,2011-2013年为中等,2008-2010年为差。结果与实际工作情况相符。结论两种方法的综合评价显示金昌市儿童EPI疫苗基础免疫接种率逐年上升,且评价结果更为准确、合理。Objective To evaluate primary immunization coverage levels for vaccines in the Expanded Program on Immunization(EPI) in Jinchang city. Methods We used TOPSIS and RSR methods to compare coverage rates of EPI vaccines in Jinchang from 2008 to 2017. Results TOPSIS showed that coverage of childhood vaccines was higher in 2017, and was lower in 2008; coverage during 2012-2017 was higher than during 2008-2011. RSR showed that coverage in 2014-2017 was highest, followed by 2011-2013 coverage and 2008-2010 coverage, which was the lowest. Results were consistent with actual performance. Conclusions The two methods showed increasing coverage of EPI vaccines in Jinchang. Evaluation results were accurate and reasonable.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222