语文辞书引证疏误类举——以《汉语大词典》“玉”部为例  

Some Citation Errors in Chinese Language Lexicography:Taking "玉" Radical in Grand Chinese Dictionary as an Example

作　　者：王本灵 WANG Ben ling(School of Chinese Studies,Jiangsu Normal University,Xuzhou 221116,China)

机构地区：[1]江苏师范大学文学院,江苏徐州221116

出　　处：《徐州工程学院学报（社会科学版）》2018年第6期58-63,共6页Journal of Xuzhou Institute of Technology：Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：江苏高校哲学社会科学研究基金资助项目"大型语文辞书引证疏误及解决对策研究"(2014SJB378)

摘　　要：书证是大型语文辞书的重要组成部分。作为高质量的工具书,其引证应精确恰当。但当前几部大型语文辞书的书证均存在各种问题。文章以《汉语大词典》为例,重点考察了书中"玉"部的书证,指出并订补了多达数十条问题。希望藉此能引起编纂者的重视,在语文工具书的编纂、修订过程中,采取切实有效的手段,避免此类问题的发生。As an important component of every high qualified dictionary,citation should be accurate and appropriate. However,there are various problems in the citation of several large Chinese dictionaries. Tak ing ＂玉＂ radical in Grand Chinese Dictionary as an example,this paper revises and supplements dozens of errors in its citations. It is hoped that this will attract the attention of the compilers to take effective meas ures in editing and revising the language reference books.

关 键 词：语文辞书 书证问题 汉语大词典 “玉”部 

分 类 号：H164[语言文字—汉语]