超越集权主义模式:关于“前三十年”国家与社会关系的海外中国研究述评  

Beyond Totalitarianism:Critical Review of Oversea China Studies Concerning the State-Society Relationship in the First Thirty Years of PRC

作　　者：肖文明 

机构地区：[1]中山大学博雅学院

出　　处：《开放时代》2018年第6期207-223,共17页Open Times

基　　金：2017年高校基本科研业务费中山大学优秀青年教师重点培育项目"文化社会学视域下的国家理论研究"(项目编号:17wkzd14);中山大学本科教学改革研究项目"‘人文与社会科学相结合’理念下的<古典社会学理论>课程改革研究"的资助

摘　　要：晚近"新革命史"的历史叙述重新引发对新中国成立后的前三十年的国家与社会关系的研究关注,且明确挑战迄今仍具强烈影响力的集权主义模式,但尚未提供较为详细的替代性的国家与社会关系的理论框架,也忽略了社会科学背景下的海外中国研究的学术积累。本文系统梳理了海外中国研究的相关进展,对有关理论概念进行了批判性的辨析和评述,指出这些研究都从不同角度挑战了集权主义模式,这是可与"新革命史"引发共鸣的地方。基于这一系统的述评,本文特别指出,国家与社会互动互构模式是迄今最好的解释框架,但需要整合国家能力模式与其他国家理论。本文的探讨将为更具整合性的国家与社会关系理论框架提供基础,而这将是超越集权主义模式的最佳路径,也将为"新革命史"等历史叙述提供理论参照。The"new history of revolution"has reignited the interest on the state-society relationship in the first thirty years of PRC and posed a challenge to the still influential paradigm of totalitarianism. However,it has failed to provide an alternative theoretical framework of state-society relationship,and has also neglected the mounting body of oversea scholarship of China Studies on this subject. Based on a systematical review of the overseas literature,this article critically discusses several important concepts and points out that the paradigm of state-society interaction is the best theoretical framework so far,but it could still improve itself by absorbing the insights provided by the state capacity model and other state theories. This article aims to provide a solid foundation for a more integrative theoretical framework of state-society relationship which can best transcend the totalitarianism paradigm and provide a theoretical reference for the"new history of revolution".

关 键 词：新革命史 国家与社会关系 集权主义 国家能力 

分 类 号：D61[政治法律—政治学]