从脑文本到终稿：易卜生及《社会支柱》中的伦理选择  

From Brain Text to the Final Draft:On Ibsen's Ethical Choices in Pillars of Society

作　　者：苏晖[1] 熊卉 Su Hui;Xiong Hui(the School of Chinese Language and Literature,Central China Normal Universit;Central China Normal Universit;Foreign Languages College,Jiangxi Normal University（Wuhan 430079,China)

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学文学院 [2]江西师范大学外国语学院

出　　处：《外国文学研究》2018年第5期48-58,共11页Foreign Literature Studies

基　　金：华中师范大学中央高校基本科研业务项目“东西方戏剧经典的伦理叙事研究”(SK02072018-0324)

摘　　要：脑文本是文学伦理学批评的重要术语之一。从文学伦理学批评视角来看,易卜生的戏剧《社会支柱》的四个稿本是作家脑文本的体现,而四个稿本之间的变化是易卜生在把脑文本解码成书写文本过程中进行的伦理选择的外化;戏剧主人公卡斯腾·博尼克的理性意志与非理性意志进行了剧烈的博弈,其伦理选择亦与脑文本有着密切的联系;脑文本的动态变化及其与伦理选择之间的关系体现出易卜生的伦理意识,他在剧中探讨了关于个人与社会的伦理关系、社会普遍伦理道德观念以及两性伦理关系和女性地位这三个伦理问题,表达了个人追求自由的重要性,揭示了社会发展的丑陋面,肯定了女性的重要作用,从而揭示了戏剧的道德教诲本质。The paper reads the four drafts of Henrik Ibsen＇s play Pillars of Society as his ＂brain texts＂（a key term of Ethical Literary Criticism）.Through discussing the revisions in each draft,the paper investigates Ibsen＇s ethical choices in ＂decoding＂ his brain text into written text.The dynamic interconnection between ethical choice and brain text is also embodied in characters＇ development,such as Kasten Bernick＇s inner conflict between his rational will and irrational will.The purpose of this paper is to sort out Ibsen＇s ethical concerns in each revision,including the relationship between the individual and the society,the concept of the public,and the status of women in the relationship between men and women.

关 键 词：亨里克·易卜生 《社会支柱》 脑文本 伦理选择 

分 类 号：I533.073[文学—其他各国文学]