检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:鲍嵘 潘闻舟 BAO Rong;PAN Wen-zhou(Institute of Education Science,Zhejiang Normal University,Jinhua 321004,China)
机构地区:[1]浙江师范大学田家炳教育科学研究院,浙江金华321004
出 处:《高等教育研究》2018年第9期93-99,共7页Journal of Higher Education
基 金:中国学位与研究生教育学会委托课题(1800310)
摘 要:学科专业分类与学位授予目录在推动高校回应知识生产和社会需求、规范人才培养方面发挥着关键作用。印度学科专业分类目录与学位授予目录在政府、市场、高校三重逻辑影响下,形成了双目录发展模式,两个目录在学科划分、框架、标准和调整机制上差异明显,发挥了各自不同的作用。印度学科专业目录和学位授予目录功能分化与协调的经验,为我国学科和学位管理体制改革提供了一条新思路。The compilation and establishment of the disciplines,specialties catalog and academic degrees catalog plays a key role in adapting to knowledge production and social needs and standardizing the advanced professional cultivation.Under the influence of the triple logic of government-market-university,Indian standard classification of educational fields and specification of degrees have evolved a dual-catalog development model,i.e.there are obvious structural differences on their disciplines division,classification framework,classification standard and adjustment mechanism,and they play different functions.Learning from the functional differentiation and coordination of these two catalogs can provide new ideas for the reform of disciplines,specialties and academic degrees management system in China.
分 类 号:G640[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.72