环保督政约谈的祛魅与重塑  

Disenchantment and Re-construction of Interview of Administrative Supervision on Environmental Protection

作　　者：汪太贤[1] 陈应珍[1] WANG Tai-xian;CHEN Ying-zhen(School of Administrative Law,Southwest University of Political Science ＆ Law,Chongqing 401120 China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学行政法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《河北法学》2018年第11期28-41,共14页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：国家社科基金项目<协商式行政执法研究>(13BFX035);福州大学科技发展基金资助项目<行政不作为的法律责任与实现机制研究>(14SKQ11);西南政法大学行政法学院博士研究生学术研究立项<法治政府视角下行政执法协商和解法律问题研究>

摘　　要：环保督政约谈实现了从"督企"到"督政"的环境监管模式变革,对于督促地方政府落实环境质量责任具有重大的现实价值。但囿于末端治理方式的局限、约谈人的权力不足、功能定位的偏颇、制度自身的缺失或缺陷等因素,还存在约谈体制混乱、长效性或实效性不足、约谈后的责任追究乱象、约谈程序的交涉性不充分等缺陷。应抓住当前国家机构改革的契机,以协作治理为指导思想,以合法性及协调性为基本原则,从法律属性、功能及具体制度层面予以重塑。Interview of administrative supervision transforms environmental supervision model from supervising enterprise to supervising government, and has substantially realistic value to urge local government to fulfill environmental quality responsibility. Attributing to such factors as the limitation of end-of-pipe treatment, deficiency ofpower of environmental protection department, biased functional orientation and lack or defect of interview system, it has following issues： interview system is confused; lack of long-term validity or effectiveness; chaos on responsibility investigation; negotiation is inadequate of interview procedure etc. we should re-construct its legal attribute, function and systems based on the guiding ideology of cooperative administration as well as the basic principle of legitimacy and coordination under the background of government institutional reform.

关 键 词：环保督政约谈 地方政府 环境质量责任 机构改革 重塑 

分 类 号：X32[环境科学与工程—环境工程]