检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱毅 赵杰 赵学通 段志超 尚海丽 盘文政 Zhu Yi;Zhao Jie;Zhao Xuetong;Duan Zhichao;Shang Haili;Pan Wenzheng(China Tobacco Hunan Industrial Co.,Ltd,Changsha 410000;Yunnan Huaye Investment Co.,Lid,Kunming 650011;Yunnan Microbial Fermentation Engineering Research Center Co.,Ltd,Kunming 650217)
机构地区:[1]湖南中烟工业有限责任公司,长沙410000 [2]云南华叶投资有限责任公司,昆明650011 [3]云南省微生物发酵工程研究中心有限公司,昆明650217
出 处:《中国农学通报》2018年第26期37-41,共5页Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
基 金:湖南中烟工业有限责任公司资助项目"云南烟区烟叶生产质量体系建设及技术推广"(2016530101001144)
摘 要:为研究不同微生物肥料对烤烟的影响,以2种不同微生物肥料为供试肥料,‘云烟87’为供试品种,对其生长势、田间农艺性状、抗病性、烟叶质量以及其主要经济性状进行比较试验。结果表明,3个处理的大田生育期均为101天。施恩格兰微生物菌剂的烤烟产量比对照组增加115.50 kg/hm2,产值增加4806.45元/hm2,中上等烟比例增加2.73%;烤烟叶片结构疏松,油分稍有,化学成分略好于对照,抗病性强于其他处理。施保得生物肥的烤烟产量比对照组增加49.50 kg/hm2,产值增加1669.80元/hm2,中上等烟比例增加1.01%,烟叶结构稍密,油分少,单叶重最重,化学成分更协调。综合分析可得,2种生物肥都能增产增值,施用恩格兰微生物菌剂对烟株大田长势具有较好效果,而施用保得生物肥使得化学成分更协调,感官评价更好。To study the effects of different microbial fertilizers on tobacco, two kinds of microbial fertilizers wereused as test fertilizer and‘Yunyan 87’was used as the test material. A comparison experiment was carried outon growth, agronomic traits, disease resistance, tobacco qualities and their main economic characteristics. Theresults showed that the average growth period of the three treatments was 101 days. Compared with the control,the yield and output value of tobacco increased by 115.50 kg/hm2 and 4806.45 yuan/hm2 by using the Engranmicrobial fertilizer, and the proportion of superior tobacco increased by 2.73%. In addition, the structure oftobacco leaves was sparse, and leaves had a little oil, and the chemical components were better than thecontrol. The tobacco with Engran microbial agent had better disease resistance than other treatments.Compared with the control, the yield and output value of tobacco with Baode biological fertilizer increased by49.50 kg/hm2 and 1669.80 yuan/hm2, respectively, and the proportion of superior tobacco increased by 1.01%compared with that of the control. At the same time, the structure of tobacco leaf was slightly dense, and theleaves had less oil, and the weight of simple leaf was the heaviest in the three treatments. Overall, the chemicalcomponents of tobacco leaf were optimal with Baode biological fertilizer. In general, both microbial fertilizerscould increase the yield, the Engran microbial agent has better effect on field growth, but lower tobacco qualitycompared with Baode biological fertilizer. The tobacco with Baode biological fertilizer has better coordination of intrinsic chemical components and superior sensory evaluation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28