检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:冯淑芬[1] 李淑影 甘红[1] FENG Shu -feng , LI Shu -ying, HONG Gan(Department of orpedies, The first affiliated hospital of Guangzhou university of Chinese medicine, Guangzhou 51040)
机构地区:[1]广东省广州中医药大学第一附属医院骨科,广东广州510405
出 处:《中国伤残医学》2018年第19期98-99,共2页Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine
摘 要:目的:通过Meta分析评价综合护理对疼痛护理干预对创伤骨科患者疼痛的影响.方法:通过检索CNKI、万方、CBM中比较是否使用综合护理干预创伤骨科患者疼痛效果的随机对照实验和回顾性队列研究文献,并追查已纳入文献的参考文献,做独立的文献筛查、资料提取和质量评价.所得数据通过Stata 12.0统计软件完成Meta分析,比较综合护理干预后的VAS评分,患者满意度.结果:本研究共纳入了14篇文献中的1901例创伤骨科的病人.结果显示综合护理干预下的病人疼痛评分更低(P〈0.001),满意度更高(P〈0.0001),对比具有统计学意义.结论:在创伤骨科疼痛患者的护理中,疼痛综合护理干预可以提高患者满意度,降低患者疼痛.疼痛护理干预仍有待进一步的挖掘,用于其他疾病的护理当中.Objective:To compare the effects of nursing intervention of pain for trauma patients. Methods: We comprehensively searched, CNKI, WangFang database, CBM and performed a systematic review and cumulative meta - analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective comparative studies assessing. Methodological quality of the trials was critically assessed, and relevant data were extracted. Statistical software Stata 12.0 was used for data - analysis. A total of 14 trials involving 1901 Patients were identiffed as meeting all the eligibility criteria. Results: Nursing intervention of pain for trauma patients significantly decreased the VAS grade ( P 〈 0.001 ) and increase the patient satisfaction ( P 〈 0. 001 ). Conclusion: Nursing intervention in the site of pain for trauma patients in higher satisfaction and lower VAS grade.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28