网络版权领域解释适用《中华人民共和国反不正当竞争法》第二条前提研究  

Study of the Application of Article Two of The Anti-Unfair Competition Law under Cyber Situations

作　　者：吴柯苇 WE Kewei(School of Civil and Commercial Law,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学民商法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《成都理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第6期9-14,共6页Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences

摘　　要：我国《反不正当竞争法》(1993颁布,2017年修订)明列了具体不正当竞争行为,并在第二条中对"不正当竞争行为"做出定义。但随着行业更新及科技演进,尤其在网络版权领域,出现了许多新型竞争模式。其中,有的属于正当的市场竞争行为,有的不是。如何分清正当和非正当的界限,弥合成文法固有缺陷,不可不察。适度允许该法第二条进行扩张解释,同时确立统一的解释前提,防止"口袋化"的司法适用,不失为一种良策。因此,在网络版权领域扩张适用《反不正当竞争法》第二条时,必须坚持具体问题具体分析,并遵循以下前提:明确特定领域,事实查明优先,事实损害干预,因果举证倒置,非公益容忍和穷尽特殊条款救济。The Anti -Unfair Competition Law （promulgated in 1993, revised in 2017） lists 11 types of unfair competition practices. That gives definition of ＂unfair competition behavior＂ in its article two. However, with the update of industries and technology evolution, especially in the field of eyber copyright, many new modes of competition have shown on. How to distinguish between legitimate and unlawful behaviors, and how to bridge the inherent shortcomings of written law need more deliberation. Appropriately allowing the expansion of interpretation of article two, by establishing a unified interpretation of the premise, in order to prevent arbitrary judicial application, can be a good method. When expanding the article two in the field of online copyright, we must adhere to the specific analysis of specific issues and follow some prerequisites： Clarification of specific areas; facts prioritized first; substantial damage intervention; causal inversion of evidence, tolerance on non public interest issue, and exhaustive special provisions first.

关 键 词：反不正当竞争法 一般条款 适用前提 网络版权 解释适用 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]