互文的抄袭潜势与抄袭的互文掩饰——学术引用的批评话语分析  

Intertextual Potential for Plagiarism and Intertextual Disguise of Plagiarism: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Academic Citation

作　　者：赵芃[1] 刘璇 

机构地区：[1]天津商业大学外国语学院,天津300134 [2]天津外国语大学中央文献翻译研究基地,天津300204

出　　处：《天津外国语大学学报》2018年第6期17-29,共13页Journal of Tianjin Foreign Studies University

基　　金：天津市哲学社会科学规划项目"批评话语分析学派及分支理论方法比较研究"(TJWW17-020);国家社会科学基金项目"中国学术话语体系的构建及其与国际学术话语交流策略研究"(14BYY070)

摘　　要：抄袭现象作为一种违反学术规范的引用可以从社会角度分析,也可以从语言角度分析,前者涉及学术道德问题,后者涉及引用不当及互文表达的扭曲与隐藏。运用Fairclough对互文性的阐释和分类,从语言的角度观察并分析学术论文中互文与抄袭的关系,发现引用本身具有一定的复杂性和隐性,为学术写作带来了挑战,也为抄袭的产生提供了潜在空间。抄袭通过互文表述的扭曲或隐藏掩饰他者声音,不能如实呈现他者声音的意义与地位,也是作者失声的一种体现。抄袭不仅对他人学术成果造成损害,也是作者个人声音建构的失败,影响成果的学术性和可靠性。Plagiarism, as a form of citation which violates academic norms, can be analyzed on the social level as a problem of academic integrity and from the linguistic perspective as inappropriate citation and distortion or concealment of intertextuality. Focusing on its linguistic factors, this paper applies Fairclough's interpretations on intertextuality to analyse the intertextual relationship in plagiarism cases, and finds that the complexity and implicity of citation may lead to the obstacles of academic writing and even provide potential for plagiarism. Due to the disguise of intertextual distortion or concealment, authors fail to reach the appropriateness of representing the others' voices, which is regarded as plagiarism. It is argued that plagiarism makes authors voiceless, so as to damage not only the academic construction of meaning, but also his professionality and creditability.

关 键 词：学术抄袭 引用 互文性 批评话语分析 

分 类 号：H0[语言文字—语言学]