论人民陪审员制度的完善  

On the perfection of the people's jury system

作　　者：常天阳 CHANG Tianyang(Zhengzhou University,School of Law,Zhengzhou 450001,China)

机构地区：[1]郑州大学法学院,河南郑州450001

出　　处：《周口师范学院学报》2018年第6期124-129,共6页Journal of Zhoukou Normal University

摘　　要：人民陪审员制度对推进司法民主,促进司法公正,保障人民群众有序参与司法具有积极意义。《人民陪审员制度改革试点工作实施办法》对人民陪审员制度进行了改革,呈现出六大亮点:优化选任条件;改革选任程序;扩大参审范围;明确参审职责;规范参审程序;完善保障机制。但是,人民陪审员制度仍然存在较多问题:选任标准依然"苛刻";选任方式单一,不均衡;人民陪审员身份不独立;明确的职能定位,却难以操作。对此,大胆提出设想,建议适用刚性转向柔性的选任条件;确立以案件为基数的选任数量;构建多方位结合的选任方式;重设相对独立的管理机构;以案件类型为标准明确职能定位。The people＇s jury system is of positive significance to promote judicial democracy, promote judicial justice and ensure the orderly participation of the people in the judiciary. In 2015, the supreme law and the justice department issued in the people＇s juror system reform measures for the implementation of the pilot work, the reform of the people＇s juror sys tern, and presents the six main window： optimizing selection conditions; Reform of elective procedures; Expanding the scope of participation; Clarify the duties of participation; To regulate the procedure of participation; Improve the safeguard mechanism. However, there are still many problems in the people＇s jury system： the selection criteria are still ＂harsh＂; The selection method is single and unbalanced; The identity of the people＇s jurors is not independent; Clear functional positio ning, but difficult to operate. In this regard, it is suggested to propose the optional conditions for rigid steering flexibility. To establish the number of selected cases based on the case; To construct an optional method of multi azimuth combination; Resetting relatively independent management bodies; Define functional orientation with the type of case.

关 键 词：人民陪审 选任程序 司法民主 司法改革 

分 类 号：D916.2[政治法律—法学]